ПРИМЕЧАНИЯ 1

См.: Hart H. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961. P. 79 - 88. 3

См.: FeinbergJ.

Hart H. Op. cit. E 144. 5

См.: fuller L. The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969. P. 35 - 37. 6

Hart H. Op. cit. P. 353. 7

Aleksander L. Striking back at the empire: a brief survey of problems in Dworkin's theory // Law and Philosophy, 1987, № 6. P. 419. 8

Dworkin R. Taking Rights Seriously. London: Duckworth, 1977.R24. 9

Эту концепцию Дворкин заимствовал из литературной критики. Она дает приоритет такой интерпретации текста, которая вызывает самый высокий литературно-художественныйэффект. 10

Dworkin R. Law's Empire. London: Fontana, 1986. P. 53. 11

Posner R. Economic Analysis of Law. Boston: Little, Brown, 1977. P. 4. 12

Posner R. Op. cit. P. 138. 13

См.: Coase R. The problem of social cost/Journal of Law and Economics, 1960, №3. P. 1 - 30. 14

Posner R. Op. cit. P. 164. 15

См.: Baker C. The Ideology of the economic analysis of law // Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1975, №5. P. 15; ColemanJ. Markets, Morals and the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988; Sunstein C. After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State. Cambridge: Harward University Press, 1990. 16

Boyle J. (ed.). Critical Legal Studies. Dartmouth: Aldershot, 1992. P. 3. 17

См.: Kennedy D. Legal education as training for hierarchy // Kairys D. (ed). The Politics of Law: A Progression Technique. New York: Pantheon, 1982. 18

См.: Frank J. Law and the Modern Mind. London: Stewens, 1949; Llewellyn K. The Common Law Tradition: Deciding Appeals. Boston: Little, Brown, 1960. 19

Gabek P., Harris P.

WaldrmJ. The Law. London: Routledge, 1990. P. 153. 22

Smart С Feminism and the Power of Law. London: Routledge, 1989. P. 2. 23

См.: Gilligan С In a Different Voice. Cambridge: Harward University Press, 1982. 24

RifkinJ. Toward a feminist jurisprudence // Harvard Women's Law Journal, 1980, №3. P. 92. 25

Scales A. Toward a feminist jurisprudence // Indiana Law Journal, 1980, №56. P. 395. 26

MacKinnon C. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989. P. 62. 27

MacKinnon С Op. cit. P. 170. 28

Hirsch A. Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishments. Boston: Hill and Wang, 1976. 29

McBamet D. Conviction: Law, the State and the Construction of Justice. London: Macmillan, 1981. P. 153. 30

См.: Fletcher G. Rethinking Criminal Law. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. 31

Braithwaite J., Pettit P. Not Just Deserts. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990. P. 49. 32

Galanter M. Why the «hawes» come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of social change// Law and Society Review, 1974, №9. P. 95. 33

См.: Sunstein С After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State. Cambridge, Harward University Press, 1990. P. 21 - 27. 34

Griffiths J. Is law important? // New York University Law Review, 1979, №53. P. 339. 35

См.: Fried C. Contract as Promise. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981; Atiyah P. The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979; Posner R. Op. cit.

278 36 Kronman A. Contract law and distributive justice // Yale Law Journal, 1980, №89. P. 472. 37

Perry S. The impossibility of general strict liability // Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 1988, № 147. R 1. 38

Tribe L. American Constitutional Law. New York: The Foundation Press, Mineola, 1988. P. 1. 39

См.: Meeiklejohn A. Political Freedom: The Constitutional Powers of the People. New York: Oxford University Press, 1965; Boll- inger L. The Tolerant Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986. 40

Tucker D. Law, Liberalism and Free Speech. New York: Rowman and Allanheld, 1985.